DESIRE AND EXECUTION

                                                                                                                                           
          Desire, as a precept and execution as a procedural follow-up are to be blended appropriately with reference to conception and translating them into action.  Surely, many impediments  - if one wishes to say so - may crop up and such hurdles may act as a preventive cause.  This aspect should not deter a person from marching ahead towards the activity chosen.                                                                                                

         Desire is a mental faculty and it is impelled by Karma Indiriyams to do an act.  Since every action is presupposed towards an object to be achieved and that object being the goal to be attained in response to desire relentless efforts, cautious in all respects, are said to be made   I t is only through the Gnana Indiriyams - mental faculty , object can be achieved with utmost satisfaction.  The underlying factor in regard to achievement of an object is not to attain mere happiness but satisfaction as the latter implies happiness.    

         Having desired to do an act, as a principle ways and means to execute the desire in a most acceptable manner are to be thought of.  Desire as a  thought process.must lead in turn to  create procedural process..  These two processes must, therefore, be blended towards the  direction of fulfillment of desires conceived initially with a view to ending with the level of satisfaction.  No doubt, impediments blocking the way should also be attended to.                                                                                                                                      

        Thus desire as a precept and execution as a procedure remain at the substratum of an activity..

OPTIMAL EXERCISE

                                                                                                                       

          Exercise, in general, is exertion to do an act with reference to a given objective leading to the attainment of a set goal.  This precept is applicable to all activities and in particular to special exercises that   are to be made in relation to special activities.  To carry out an activity means that it implicitly requires a skill - be it manual or skilled one - and however it may be called,, it boils down to efforts being put in by a person.  It is only with the use of skills every person endeavors to do an activity to eke out his likelihood.  In this regard, the exercise done by the person doing the  activity and the person for whose benefit the activity  - both assume significance   The question now arises is as to what extent the exercise can be stretched by the   doer of the activity?  The answer is obvious in the sense that the doer must put in  optimum effort and produce optimum result  Once optimization is exercised and the result is produced, the  doer's skill is to be appreciated and rewarded, these  two terms to be understood in the context of a prudent person.  Instead, if the optimized doer is compelled to put in extra labor to do the activity of  others which he may also know, it may turn out to be a Performance punishment for him and the doer may even go to the extent of desisting from putting optimized effort in his regular work and further this extra work of  others may even sap his energy level.  Apart from this the 'other' who is expected to put in his optimized effort in his assigned work may not develop an interest even to learn or to complete his work and he is bound to adopt a 'go gay' attitude.  This attitudinal aspect on the part of the 'other' should not be encouraged   It is, therefore, fit and proper to call upon every person to do optimum exercise in his activity and make himself an indispensable person.and the performance made at the optimum level is apreciated and rewarded.

ATTITUDINAL ASPECTS - SPEAKER VS RECIPIENT

                          

     " Silence is golden'; ' Silence  may sometimes amount to speech'.  These aphorisms used to be very often thought of by me since persons speak to convey a message and recipients are abound in plenty to receive the message.  Against this background I used to attend to the attitudinal aspects of the Speaker (the term including the presenter of a statement) and the recipient ( the term including all  kinds of persons available in all media) as well to enable  comprehension of that message/statement.

     Speakers, solicited and unsolicited at times, speak out messages on a subject which concerns them or has reached them either from a primary source or secondary source.  Recipients of this message take it in their own strain, not caring to know the source relied on by the speaker and in turn attempts to convey this message with strings attached or unattached.  This modus operandi inheres in every person in spite of the application of the aphorisms even in this day.  In this context the appreciation of the message is to be thought of by the speaker as well as by the recipient.  A speaker, in the first instance, should be guarded before making a statement and to be guarded to the highest degree of caveat if the  statement concerns him.  Whatever may be the nature of the statement the speaker should ponder for a moment that this statement will be comprehended by others in relation to the attitude possessed by the speaker.  This inference holds good even when the recipient in turn endeavors to become a speaker.  After all when a message is spoken it is conveyed and communication results in.  Since every communication will remain a cause for the effect that will ensue, the speaker as well as the recipients should be concerned with their attitude prior to the making of a statement or receiving a statement.  It is but sure that if this attitudinal aspect is thought of minimization of the startling results is a possibility and this must remain to be a fundamental precept in all..