" Silence is golden'; ' Silence may sometimes amount to speech'. These aphorisms used to be very often thought of by me since persons speak to convey a message and recipients are abound in plenty to receive the message. Against this background I used to attend to the attitudinal aspects of the Speaker (the term including the presenter of a statement) and the recipient ( the term including all kinds of persons available in all media) as well to enable comprehension of that message/statement.
Speakers, solicited and unsolicited at times, speak out messages on a subject which concerns them or has reached them either from a primary source or secondary source. Recipients of this message take it in their own strain, not caring to know the source relied on by the speaker and in turn attempts to convey this message with strings attached or unattached. This modus operandi inheres in every person in spite of the application of the aphorisms even in this day. In this context the appreciation of the message is to be thought of by the speaker as well as by the recipient. A speaker, in the first instance, should be guarded before making a statement and to be guarded to the highest degree of caveat if the statement concerns him. Whatever may be the nature of the statement the speaker should ponder for a moment that this statement will be comprehended by others in relation to the attitude possessed by the speaker. This inference holds good even when the recipient in turn endeavors to become a speaker. After all when a message is spoken it is conveyed and communication results in. Since every communication will remain a cause for the effect that will ensue, the speaker as well as the recipients should be concerned with their attitude prior to the making of a statement or receiving a statement. It is but sure that if this attitudinal aspect is thought of minimization of the startling results is a possibility and this must remain to be a fundamental precept in all..
No comments:
Post a Comment